Korea`s Nucular Program 2007

Graphic showing seismic activity at the time of the testInformationCountryNorth KoreaTest site,.Period10:35:28 KST, October 9, 2006Number of tests1Test typeUnknownDevice typeFissionMax. yield. 0.48 kilotons of TNT (2.0 TJ) (Chinese academics). 0.55–12 kilotons of TNT (2.3–50.2 TJ) ( & South Korean estimates, but raised doubts on the lower end estimates because it does not correspond with the 4.2 ). 5–15 kilotons of TNT (21–63 TJ).

• Korea`s Nuclear Program 2007 Honda

1. Irans nuclear progress commentary text and context irans nuclear program. Hyundai Vehicles Essay Sample. The Hyundai Elantra in South Korea. This is the first environmental project of the company’s social contribution program. The Massachusetts Democrat said Thursday on SiriusXM's 'Alter Family Politics' program that she.
2. While North Korea’s weapons program has been plutonium-based from the start, in the past decade, intelligence emerged pointing to a second route to a bomb using highly enriched uranium. North Korea openly acknowledged a uranium enrichment program in 2009, but has said its purpose is the production of fuel for nuclear power.

0.7–2 kilotons of TNT (2.9–8.4 TJ)(Estimations from )Test chronology. The 2006 North Korean nuclear test was the of a conducted by on October 9, 2006.On October 3, 2006, North Korea announced its intention to conduct a nuclear test. The blast is generally estimated to have had an explosive force of less than one, and some radioactive output was detected. United States officials suggested the device may have been a nuclear explosive that misfired.An anonymous official at the North Korean Embassy in Beijing told a South Korean newspaper that the explosive output was smaller than expected.

Because of the secretive nature of North Korea and small yield of the test, there remains some question as to whether it was a successful test of an unusually small device (which would have required sophisticated technology), or a partially failed ' or dud. A scientific paper later estimated the yield as 0.48 kilotons.It was reported that the government of the People's Republic of China was given a 20-minute advance warning that the test was about to occur. China sent an emergency alert to, through the at which time was told by 'shortly after' 10 p.m. that a test was imminent.North Korea had been suspected of maintaining a clandestine nuclear weapons development program since the early 1980s when it constructed a -producing at, and various diplomatic means had been used by the international community to attempt to limit North Korea's nuclear work to peaceful and scientific means and encouraging North Korea to participate in international treaties. In 1994, the United States and North Korea signed the ', whereby North Korea agreed to freeze its graphite moderated reactor program in exchange for fuel, moves toward normalization of political and economic relations, and the construction of two modern powered. Eventually, North Korea's existing nuclear facilities were to be dismantled, and the spent reactor fuel taken out of the country.However, in 2002, rumors circulated that North Korea was pursuing both technology and plutonium reprocessing technologies in defiance of the Agreed Framework. North Korea reportedly told American diplomats in private that they were in possession of nuclear weapons, citing American failures to uphold their own end of the 'Agreed Framework' as a motivating force.

North Korea later clarified that it did not possess weapons yet, but that it had a right to possess them. In late 2002 and early 2003, North Korea began to take steps to eject inspectors while re-routing spent for plutonium reprocessing for weapons purposes. Throughout the course of 2003, North Korean and American officials exchanged harsh words and staged military exercises which were interpreted by the other party to be aggressive. As late as the end of 2003, North Korea claimed that it would freeze its nuclear program in exchange for American concessions – in particular a non-aggression treaty – but a final agreement was not reached and talks continued to be cancelled or fall through. North Korea withdrew from the in 2003 after not receiving light-water reactors promised by the United States which were going to be delivered in exchange for North Korea not developing their own power plants, as understood in the 'Agreed Framework'.In early 2004 former director, as part of an unofficial U.S.

Promised, but would be delayed until 2007 or 2008. North Korea threatened to resume its nuclear program if the 1994 agreement was not fulfilled. In addition to nuclear weapons, many in the international community were also concerned about North Korea’s missile capa-bilities. In 1998, North Korea conducted a test.

Delegation, was allowed to inspect North Korea's plutonium production facilities. Hecker later testified before the that while North Korea seems to have successfully extracted plutonium from the spent fuel rods, he saw no evidence at the time that they had actually produced a workable weapon.

In 2007, the former senior scientist of Pakistan, Dr. Claimed that North Korea's nuclear program was well advanced before his visit in 1993 with, former prime minister. – In September 2004, though, North Korean officials announced they had successfully processed Yongbyon plutonium into a workable nuclear deterrent. Through 2005 more diplomatic talks were attempted between the United States, North Korea, South Korea, China, Japan, and Russia (the ) but little concrete change occurred.Because North Korea had not conducted a successful test of a nuclear device, the extent of its nuclear weapons program remained ambiguous through 2005 and much of 2006.

Korea`s Nuclear Program 2007 Honda

Though North Korea conducted numerous missile tests (some of which were branded failures by international experts ), the question of whether they had actually mastered all aspects of nuclear weapons technology – ranging from material production to complex needed to produce the final detonation – remained unanswered. As of 2013 there was agreement in the U.S. Intelligence community that North Korea could build a 'modest' bomb with a yield of between 6 and 10 kilotons, but disagreement between, and the over whether it could deploy a miniaturized warhead on a missile.

North Korean statements Rumours of an impending nuclear test circulated during 2005 and early 2006, though none came to immediate fruition. On October 3, 2006, however, North Korea claimed that it would soon conduct a nuclear test, and on October 9, 2006, the state claimed to have successfully conducted a test. The, the state's news agency, issued the following statement:The field of scientific research in the DPRK successfully conducted an under secure conditions on October 9, (2006), at a stirring time when all the people of the country are making a great leap forward in the building of a great, prosperous, powerful socialist nation.It has been confirmed that there was no such danger as radioactive emission in the course of the nuclear test as it was carried out under scientific consideration and careful calculation.The nuclear test was conducted with indigenous wisdom and technology 100 percent.

It marks an historic event as it greatly encouraged and pleased the and people that have wished to have powerful self-reliant defence capability.It will contribute to defending the peace and stability on the and in the area around it. Later, the North Korean envoy to the U.N. Said it would be better for the Security Council to offer its congratulations rather than pass 'useless'. Threats of war On October 10, 2006, an unnamed North Korean official was quoted as saying that North Korea could launch a unless the United States would sit down for face-to-face talks. However, few, if any, military and defense experts believed that the North Koreans possessed the technology to mount a to a.On October 11, the reported that North Korea had threatened war if attempts would be made to penalize them through further sanctions. This statement occurred even as Japan moved to tighten sanctions on the country.

South Korea said they were ensuring their troops were prepared for. A major, stationed along the, said that the overall situation was 'calm' but that 'Communist troops were more boldly trying to provoke their southern counterparts: across the demarcation line, making throat-slashing hand gestures, and trying to talk to the troops.'

On the day of the test, the North Korean Foreign Ministry stated that 'if the U.S. Keeps pestering us and increases pressure, we will regard it as a declaration of war and will take a series of physical corresponding measures'.On October 17 North Korea denounced UN sanctions over its nuclear test as a declaration of war and the United States and other nations suspected that North Korea was seeking to conduct a second nuclear test despite international pressure. Kim Jong-il's alleged apology On October 20, 2006, allegedly said that he was 'sorry' over his country's nuclear test, and wished to return to talk with the United Nations. According to a Chinese envoy, Kim Jong-il said,If the U.S. Makes a concession to some degree, we will also make a concession to some degree, whether it be bilateral talks or six-party talksKim Jong-Il also stated that he had no future plans to test another nuclear device; the discounted this report.

Return to six-party talks On October 31, 2006, North Korea agreed to rejoin. The agreement was struck in a day of unpublicized discussions between the senior envoys from the United States, China and North Korea at a government guesthouse in Beijing. The talks resumed on December 18, 2006.Yield estimates and authenticity.

50-year predictions, according to, indicating the probability of the detected blast being due to natural causes.The low yield of the test initially raised questions as to whether it was a nuclear explosion but detection of airborne radioactive isotopes by a United States military aircraft confirmed that it was a nuclear explosion. Radioactive isotopes of the element are produced by the atom splitting that takes place in nuclear explosions and readily seeps out even from underground tests. The advance warning of the test sent to the Chinese government reportedly said that the planned was to be equivalent to approximately four in strength, but most outside estimates, based largely on readings, put the yield at much less.At a meeting with, stated that 'the power of the tests carried out was 5 to 15 kilotons', though this early estimate is much higher than any other international estimate. An early report by the Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources of South Korea said the blast was equivalent to an earthquake registering 3.58 on the, which corresponds to the explosion of 100 tons of TNT.

This was later revised to at least 800 tons, corresponding to a blast wave of 4.2. The also estimates the blast wave at 4.2. (Note that 4.2 is considerably more powerful than 3.58 because the Richter scale is a.)According to, 'initial and unconfirmed South Korean reports indicate that the test was a fission device with a yield of 0.55 kT. The figure of 0.55 kT, however, seems too low given the 4.2 register on the Richter scale. This could suggest – depending upon the geological make-up of the test site – a yield of 2–12 kT'.An official in France's reported that they estimated the blast was 'about or less than a kiloton' and expressed uncertainty about whether or not the blast was actually nuclear. There have been various comparable in yield to small nuclear detonations, such as the U.S. ' explosion from 1985, which used conventional explosives to simulate a 4 kiloton detonation.

According to the Washington Times anonymous U.S. Intelligence sources speculated there 'was a seismic event that registered about 4 on the, but it still isn't clear if it was a nuclear test. You can get that kind of seismic reading from high explosives'. Explains that this blast was equivalent to the explosive force of about US$100,000 worth of. NASA Blue Marble Image of estimated location of the test (41.2943° N 129.1342° E)According to initial reports from South Korean government sources, the test was carried out at a mountain in Musadan-ri in -kun, near the city of, in province on the northeast coast. However, later reports from the state identified the site as being a place in Sangpyong-ri, about 15 km from the coastal city of and about 50 km west of Musadan-ri.The Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources reported seismic waves measuring 3.58 on the.

The reported that a occurred at 01:35:28 UTC (10:35:28 am local time, ) on October 9, 2006, and measured 4.3 on the. It occurred at the with a horizontal location uncertainty of ±9.6 km (6.0 miles). This is near, 73 km (45 mi) north of, 90 km (56 mi) southwest of, 180 km (110 mi) south of, and 385 km (239 mi) northeast of. International reaction International condemnation of the tests by governments has been nearly unanimous, including from North Korea's close ally and benefactor, the People's Republic of China. All of the condemned the nuclear test.

On October 10, however, South Korean Prime Minister told Parliament that South Korea will not support any United Nations resolution containing military measures against North Korea in retaliation for its nuclear test. Economic impact Negative economic effects were seen throughout the region after the test. South Korea's index fell 2.4% to 1319.4, forcing the Korea Exchange to suspend trading for five minutes upon receiving the news. The Japanese and Taiwanese stock exchanges were closed for a market holiday on the day of the test.

The Japanese yen also fell to a seven-month low against the United States dollar while oil on the world market rose above US$60 a barrel. Rose 1% as a safe haven investment. Several stock markets in Asia from the to the have traded lower, possibly due to the tests.

American stock markets were mixed, with the down at its open the next day; however, at 10:30 am EDT, the Dow rebounded and concluded the day with an increase of 7.60 points (+0.06%). And of India, however, showed some strength.United Nations' response. Main article:On October 14, 2006, the UN Security Council unanimously approved limited military and economic. All five permanent members stated that the sanctions, set out in, were intended to penalize the country's regime, not inhabitants. They also stated that if North Korea were willing to cooperate and complied with all the measures contained in the resolution, the sanctions would be lifted. The United States compromised on its initial desire to block all imports of military equipment, and to have an unlimited reference to so providing a legal justification for future military action, in order to gain full support for the resolution. See also.

^ Lian-Feng Zhao, Xiao-Bi Xie, Wei-Min Wang, and Zhen-Xing Yao, ', Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 20–2589; doi:10.17128. ^. From the original on October 16, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006. ^.

Archived from on October 31, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2006. ^. February 15, 2013. Retrieved March 2, 2013.

March 10, 2017. Medalia, Jonathan. Congressional Research Service.

November 23, 2009. The Washington Post.

October 13, 2006. ^. October 16, 2006. Archived from on September 30, 2007. Retrieved October 16, 2006. October 10, 2006.

Archived from on October 28, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006. International Herald Tribune. From the original on October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006., January 21, 2004. News, A.

(May 30, 2008). Sanger, David (April 12, 2013). New York Times. Retrieved October 9, 2014. October 10, 2006. Archived from on October 26, 2006.

Retrieved October 10, 2006. October 10, 2006, at the Voice of America October 9, 2006. Archived from on October 10, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2006. From the original on October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2006.

^ Greimel, Hans (October 11, 2006). Associated Press. Download driver samsung gt s5260. Archived from on October 11, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2006. Fox News October 11, 2006. Yahoo News October 17, 2006.

NBC News, The Associated Press and Reuters. October 20, 2006. From the original on October 29, 2006.

Retrieved October 30, 2006. November 1, 2006. October 16, 2006. Retrieved May 27, 2009.

Collins, Graham P. (January 2007).

Scientific American. 296 (1): 18–18B.:. Retrieved February 18, 2014.

^ cnn.com, October 11, 2006, at the. ^. October 9, 2006.

Archived from on October 27, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006. October 9, 2006.

Retrieved October 9, 2006. Archived from on October 17, 2006. From the original on October 29, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006. October 9, 2006. Gertiz, Bill, Washington Times, October 10, 2006.

Seitz, Russel (October 13, 2006). Wall Street Journal. From the original on January 11, 2009. Retrieved October 13, 2006.

Archived from on October 31, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006. February 15, 2013. Retrieved March 2, 2013. ^ For general reference on the and on general parameters of, see, for example, Carey Sublette's (esp. The Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions section).

For detailed information, see Chuck Hansen, (Sunnyvale, CA: Chukelea Publications, 1995). Archived from on October 27, 2006. Retrieved October 17, 2006. Retrieved April 16, 2012. The Sydney Morning Herald. October 9, 2006.

Retrieved October 9, 2006. Archived from on September 29, 2007. Retrieved October 9, 2006. October 9, 2010. Archived from on April 27, 2014.

Retrieved December 11, 2010. October 4, 2006. Retrieved October 10, 2006. Retrieved October 10, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.

From the original on October 14, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006. October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.

Archived from on September 29, 2007. Retrieved October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.

From the original on October 6, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006. Arms Control Today.

November 2006. Archived from on November 8, 2006. Retrieved November 5, 2006.External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to., Arms Control Today, November 2006. – United States Geological Survey., including the site of the October 2006 test.Wikinews story chronology 2005.

February 10:. February 19:. May 11:. June 23:. September 19:2006. August 18:. October 3:.

October 9.